Compare AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X90
Name | AllCall Madrid | Doogee X90 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 21557 | 21055 |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 5.5 " | 6.1 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x600 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 2 | 2 |
RAM | 1 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | Yes |
ROM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 2600 mAh | 3400 mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 3 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | No |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | Android 9.0 |
Material | Plastic | Plastic |
Weight | 180 g | g |
Dimensions | 154.70 x 76.20 x 8.8 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all AllCall models here
Alternatives to the AllCall Madrid: |
61.52€ ($70.60) See Details |
AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X90: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the AllCall Madrid’s camera vs Doogee X90’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | AllCall Madrid | Doogee X90 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 2 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X90: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X90, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | AllCall Madrid | Doogee X90 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2600 mAh | 3400 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 4-5 days | 5-6 days |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | 2-3 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | No | No |
Wireless charging | No |
AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X90: Antutu benchmark comparison.
AllCall Madrid in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21557 score points which is 2.38% faster than the Doogee X90, which got 21055. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X90: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
AllCall Madrid in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 66 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee X90 which got 65, it is 1.54% faster. In "Multi-core" score 229 vs 222 (3.15% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between AllCall Madrid and Doogee X90? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Madrid (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2.38% faster in the Antutu test (502 score difference).
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 1280x600.
Why it is better not to take AllCall Madrid (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee X90 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
- More battery capacity: 3400mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 800mAh).
Why it is better not to take Doogee X90 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
AllCall Madrid related comparisons
- Compare AllCall Alpha vs AllCall Madrid
- Compare AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X55
- Compare BLUBOO D2 vs AllCall Madrid
- Compare AllCall Madrid vs KOOLNEE Rainbow
- Compare Blackview A7 vs AllCall Madrid
Doogee X90 related comparisons
- Compare Doogee X90 vs Doogee N20
- Compare Doogee BL5500 Lite vs Doogee X90
- Compare Ulefone S11 vs Doogee X90
- Compare Doogee Y8C vs Doogee X90
- Compare Doogee X90 vs AllCall P10