Compare AllCall Madrid vs Kenxinda V6

AllCall Madrid vs Kenxinda V6 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of AllCall Madrid with Kenxinda V6.
Name	AllCall Madrid	Kenxinda V6

Antutu benchmark	21557	16642
CPU	MediaTek MT6580	UNISOC SC7731
Diagonal size	5.5 "	4.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	800x480
Multi-touch (number of touches)	2	2
RAM	1 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	8 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	2 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	2 Mp	2 Mp
Battery	2600 mAh	1700 mAh
Wireless charging		No
Network	3 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 7.0	Android 7.0
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	180 g	140 g
Dimensions	154.70 x 76.20 x 8.8 mm	133 x 67,4 x 8,8 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all AllCall models here Alternatives to the AllCall Madrid:	Discontinued. View all Kenxinda models here Alternatives to the Kenxinda V6:

AllCall Madrid vs Kenxinda V6: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the AllCall Madrid’s camera vs Kenxinda V6’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 2Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	AllCall Madrid	Kenxinda V6
Rear camera	8 Mp	2 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	2 Mp	2 Mp
Flash	No	No

AllCall Madrid vs Kenxinda V6: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AllCall Madrid vs Kenxinda V6, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	AllCall Madrid	Kenxinda V6
Battery	2600 mAh	1700 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	4-5 days	4-5 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours	4-5 hours
Talk time	25 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging		No

AllCall Madrid vs Kenxinda V6: Antutu benchmark comparison.

AllCall Madrid in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21557 score points which is 29.53% faster than the Kenxinda V6, which got 16642. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

AllCall Madrid

5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

21557

Kenxinda V6

4.5 inches (800x480) Glass / SC7731 / 1Gb / 8GB / 2Mp / 1700mAh

0.00€

$0.00

16642

AllCall Madrid vs Kenxinda V6: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

AllCall Madrid in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 66 points score in "Single-core" of against the Kenxinda V6 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 229 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

AllCall Madrid

5.5 inches (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh

0.00€

$0.00

66 / 229

Kenxinda V6

4.5 inches (800x480) Glass / SC7731 / 1Gb / 8GB / 2Mp / 1700mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between AllCall Madrid and Kenxinda V6? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Madrid (advantages)

Good performance: Is 29.53% faster in the Antutu test (4915 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 2Mp
Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 800x480.
More battery capacity: 2600mAh vs 1700mAh (a difference of 900mAh).

Why it is better not to take AllCall Madrid (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Kenxinda V6 (advantages)

Best weight: 40 grams less (140 vs 180).

Why it is better not to take Kenxinda V6 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

AllCall Madrid related comparisons

Kenxinda V6 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.57/5 of 63

Frequent comparisons