Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AllCall Madrid
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | AllCall Madrid |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 511288 | 21557 |
| CPU | Samsung Exynos 990 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.9 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 222 g | 180 g |
| Dimensions | 166,9 x 76 x 8,8 mm | 154.70 x 76.20 x 8.8 mm |
| Price | 670.93€ ($698.99) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all AllCall models here
Alternatives to the AllCall Madrid: |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AllCall Madrid: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra’s camera vs AllCall Madrid’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | AllCall Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung Bright S5KHM1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 10 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AllCall Madrid: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AllCall Madrid, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra | AllCall Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 4-5 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AllCall Madrid: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 511288 score points which is 2271.80% faster than the AllCall Madrid, which got 21557. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs AllCall Madrid: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 490 points score in "Single-core" of against the AllCall Madrid which got 66, it is 642.42% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2757 vs 229 (1103.93% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra and AllCall Madrid? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2271.80% faster in the Antutu test (489731 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung Bright S5KHM1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 10Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 3200x1440 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 2400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Madrid (advantages)
- Best weight: 42 grams less (180 vs 222).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take AllCall Madrid (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S22 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy A73 5G
AllCall Madrid related comparisons
- Compare AllCall Alpha vs AllCall Madrid
- Compare AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X55
- Compare BLUBOO D2 vs AllCall Madrid
- Compare AllCall Madrid vs KOOLNEE Rainbow
- Compare Blackview A7 vs AllCall Madrid