Compare Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs AllCall Madrid
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | AllCall Madrid |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 276448 | 21557 |
CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 | MediaTek MT6580 |
Diagonal size | 5.2 " | 5.5 " |
Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
RAM | 4 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | No |
ROM | 64 GB | 8 GB |
External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Dual Camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
Battery | 2500 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Wireless charging | Yes | |
Network | 4 G | 3 G |
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | Yes | No |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 7.0 |
Material | Metal | Plastic |
Weight | 139 g | 180 g |
Dimensions | 131 х 64 х 9,3 mm | 154.70 x 76.20 x 8.8 mm |
Price | 350.05€ ($405.71) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all AllCall models here
Alternatives to the AllCall Madrid: |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs AllCall Madrid: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact’s camera vs AllCall Madrid’s camera, see the difference between the 22.6Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | AllCall Madrid |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 22.6 Mp | 8 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | LED flash |
Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
Flash | No | No |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs AllCall Madrid: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs AllCall Madrid, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Sharp Aquos R2 Compact | AllCall Madrid |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2500 mAh | 2600 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 4-5 days |
Battery Life | 2-3 days | 1,5-2 days |
Working hours in hard mode | 5-6 hours | 6-7 hours |
Talk time | 25 hours | 25 hours |
Fast charging | Yes | No |
Wireless charging | Yes |
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs AllCall Madrid: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 276448 score points which is 1182.40% faster than the AllCall Madrid, which got 21557. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact vs AllCall Madrid: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 501 points score in "Single-core" of against the AllCall Madrid which got 66, it is 659.09% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1986 vs 229 (767.25% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Sharp Aquos R2 Compact and AllCall Madrid? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1182.40% faster in the Antutu test (254891 score difference).
- Best weight: 41 grams less (139 vs 180).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 22.6Mp compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Sharp Aquos R2 Compact (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Madrid (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 2600mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 100mAh).
Why it is better not to take AllCall Madrid (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Sharp Aquos R2 Compact related comparisons
- Compare AGM A8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu M8 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Nomu S50 Pro vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp Aquos R3 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
- Compare Sharp AQUOS S2 vs Sharp Aquos R2 Compact
AllCall Madrid related comparisons
- Compare AllCall Alpha vs AllCall Madrid
- Compare AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X55
- Compare BLUBOO D2 vs AllCall Madrid
- Compare AllCall Madrid vs KOOLNEE Rainbow
- Compare Blackview A7 vs AllCall Madrid