Compare Ulefone Armor 9 vs AllCall Madrid
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9 | AllCall Madrid |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 224199 | 21557 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.3 " | 5.5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 2 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 7.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 320 g | 180 g |
| Dimensions | 168.2 x 82 x 15 mm | 154.70 x 76.20 x 8.8 mm |
| Price | 369.39€ ($384.05) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all AllCall models here
Alternatives to the AllCall Madrid: |
Ulefone Armor 9 vs AllCall Madrid: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Ulefone Armor 9’s camera vs AllCall Madrid’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9 | AllCall Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GW1 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Ulefone Armor 9 vs AllCall Madrid: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Ulefone Armor 9 vs AllCall Madrid, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Ulefone Armor 9 | AllCall Madrid |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 6600 mAh | 2600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 4-5 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 1,5-2 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Ulefone Armor 9 vs AllCall Madrid: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 224199 score points which is 940.03% faster than the AllCall Madrid, which got 21557. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Ulefone Armor 9 vs AllCall Madrid: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Ulefone Armor 9 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 416 points score in "Single-core" of against the AllCall Madrid which got 66, it is 530.30% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1534 vs 229 (569.87% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Ulefone Armor 9 and AllCall Madrid? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 9 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 940.03% faster in the Antutu test (202642 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 2Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 4000mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 9 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall Madrid (advantages)
- Best weight: 140 grams less (180 vs 320).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take AllCall Madrid (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Ulefone Armor 9 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9900 Pro vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Ulefone Armor 7E vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare OUKITEL WP7 vs Ulefone Armor 9
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10 Lite vs Ulefone Armor 9
AllCall Madrid related comparisons
- Compare AllCall Alpha vs AllCall Madrid
- Compare AllCall Madrid vs Doogee X55
- Compare BLUBOO D2 vs AllCall Madrid
- Compare AllCall Madrid vs KOOLNEE Rainbow
- Compare Blackview A7 vs AllCall Madrid