0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare AllCall S1 vs Cubot J5

AllCall S1 vs Cubot J5 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of AllCall S1 with Cubot J5.

Name AllCall S1 Cubot J5
AllCall S1 Cubot J5
Antutu benchmark 23115 21244
CPU MediaTek MT6580 MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 5.5 " 5.5 "
Resolution 960x480 960x480
Multi-touch (number of touches) 2 2
RAM 2 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Dual Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 5000 mAh 2800 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 3 G 3 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led No No
Fingerprint's scanner No No
Operating system (OS) Android 8.1 Android 9.0
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 210 g 157 g
Dimensions 147.5 x 70.2 x 10.8 mm 150.3 x 72 x 9.2 mm
  Price Discontinued. View all AllCall models here
Alternatives to the AllCall S1:
60.09€ ($69.64) See Details

AllCall S1 vs Cubot J5: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the AllCall S1’s camera vs Cubot J5’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name AllCall S1 Cubot J5
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 2 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

AllCall S1 vs Cubot J5: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the AllCall S1 vs Cubot J5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name AllCall S1 Cubot J5
Battery 5000 mAh 2800 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 3-4 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours 7-8 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging No No
Wireless charging No No

AllCall S1 vs Cubot J5: Antutu benchmark comparison. AllCall S1 vs Cubot J5: Antutu benchmark comparison.

AllCall S1 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 23115 score points which is 8.81% faster than the Cubot J5, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

AllCall S1
5.5 inches (960x480) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5000mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Cubot J5
5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh
60.09€
$69.64
 

AllCall S1 vs Cubot J5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

AllCall S1 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot J5 which got 65, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 222 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

AllCall S1
5.5 inches (960x480) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 5000mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
Cubot J5
5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh
60.09€
$69.64
 

What is the difference between AllCall S1 and Cubot J5? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the AllCall S1 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 8.81% faster in the Antutu test (1871 score difference).
  • More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2800mAh (a difference of 2200mAh).

Why it is better not to take AllCall S1 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J5 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 53 grams less (157 vs 210).
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .

Why it is better not to take Cubot J5 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

AllCall S1 related comparisons

Cubot J5 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.60/5 of 40
Frequent comparisons