0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot King Kong vs BLUBOO R2

Cubot King Kong vs BLUBOO R2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong with BLUBOO R2.

Name Cubot King Kong BLUBOO R2
Cubot King Kong BLUBOO R2
Antutu benchmark 21244
CPU MediaTek MT6580 MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 5 " 5.3 "
Resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 5
RAM 2 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 4400 mAh 3500 mAh
Wireless charging
Network 3 G 3 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 7.0 Android 7.0
Material Plastic Metal and plastic
Weight 220 g g
Dimensions 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm mm
  Price 99.21€ ($106.44) See Details Notify me when it goes on sale. View all BLUBOO models here
Alternatives to the BLUBOO R2:
BLUBOO S1 - Compare

Cubot King Kong vs BLUBOO R2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs BLUBOO R2’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot King Kong BLUBOO R2
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No

Cubot King Kong vs BLUBOO R2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs BLUBOO R2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot King Kong BLUBOO R2
Battery 4400 mAh 3500 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging

Cubot King Kong vs BLUBOO R2: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot King Kong vs BLUBOO R2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the BLUBOO R2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong
5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh
99.21€
$106.44
 
BLUBOO R2
5.3" (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

Cubot King Kong vs BLUBOO R2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the BLUBOO R2 which got 65, it is 10.77% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 222 (16.22% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong
5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh
99.21€
$106.44
 
BLUBOO R2
5.3" (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3500mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and BLUBOO R2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)

  • More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 3500mAh (a difference of 900mAh).
  • Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the BLUBOO R2 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take BLUBOO R2 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot King Kong related comparisons

BLUBOO R2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.56/5 of 71
Frequent comparisons