Compare Blackview A70 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS

Blackview A70 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Blackview A70 Pro with Xiaomi Redmi 3SS.
Name	Blackview A70 Pro	Xiaomi Redmi 3SS

Antutu benchmark	108377
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T310	Qualcomm Snapdragon 616
Diagonal size	6.52 "	5 "
Resolution	1600x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	4 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	32 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX258
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	5380 mAh	4000 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 11
Material	Plastic
Weight	205 g	143 g
Dimensions	165,3 x 77,5 x 8,3 mm	139,3 x 69,6 x 8,5 mm
Price	63.56€ ($74.27) See Details	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Xiaomi models here Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Xiaomi Redmi 9A 2/32Gb - Compare Xiaomi Black Shark 2 Pro 8/128Gb - Compare Xiaomi Mi 9 Lite 6/64Gb - Compare

Blackview A70 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Blackview A70 Pro’s camera vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX258 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Blackview A70 Pro	Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX258
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Blackview A70 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview A70 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Blackview A70 Pro	Xiaomi Redmi 3SS
Battery	5380 mAh	4000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Blackview A70 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Blackview A70 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 108377 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Blackview A70 Pro

6.52 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 32GB / 13Mp Sony IMX258 / 5380mAh

63.56€

$74.27

108377

Xiaomi Redmi 3SS

5" (1280x720) / Snapdragon 616 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

Blackview A70 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 3SS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Blackview A70 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 289 points score in "Single-core" of against the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS which got 114, it is 153.51% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1128 vs 532 (112.03% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Blackview A70 Pro

6.52 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 32GB / 13Mp Sony IMX258 / 5380mAh

63.56€

$74.27

289 / 1128

Xiaomi Redmi 3SS

5" (1280x720) / Snapdragon 616 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4000mAh

On Sale Soon

114 / 532

What is the difference between Blackview A70 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi 3SS? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview A70 Pro (advantages)

Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 5380mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 1380mAh).

Why it is better not to take Blackview A70 Pro (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi 3SS (advantages)

Best weight: 62 grams less (143 vs 205).

Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi 3SS (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Blackview A70 Pro related comparisons

Xiaomi Redmi 3SS related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 16

Frequent comparisons