Compare Blackview BV6900 vs HT F801C
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | HT F801C |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 94338 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 | |
| Diagonal size | 5.84 " | " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
| RAM | 4 Gb | Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | |
| ROM | 64 GB | GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Battery | 5580 mAh | mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | |
| Network | 4 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | Yes | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
| Notifications Led | Yes | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | |
| Weight | 284 g | g |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 82.4 x 15 mm | mm |
| Price | 109.99€ ($114.59) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all HT models here
Alternatives to the HT F801C: |
Blackview BV6900 vs HT F801C: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV6900’s camera vs HT F801C’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | HT F801C |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
| Flash | No |
Blackview BV6900 vs HT F801C: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV6900 vs HT F801C, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | HT F801C |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5580 mAh | mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
| Talk time | 30 hours | |
| Fast charging | Yes | |
| Wireless charging | Yes |
Blackview BV6900 vs HT F801C: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 94338 score points which is 100.00% faster than the HT F801C, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV6900 vs HT F801C: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 178 points score in "Single-core" of against the HT F801C which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 871 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV6900 and HT F801C? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV6900 (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV6900 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the HT F801C (advantages)
Why it is better not to take HT F801C (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Blackview BV6900 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9600E vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Doogee S90C vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Doogee DG800 (Valencia) vs Blackview BV6900
HT F801C related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs ZTE Blade A530
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs UMIDIGI A5 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 6A vs Blackview BV5500 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy A8S
- Compare OUKITEL C17 Pro vs Doogee N20