Compare Blackview BV6900 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 94338 | 92177 |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6757 Pro / Helio P25 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 |
| Diagonal size | 5.84 " | 6.5 " |
| Resolution | 2280x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 4 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 9.0 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 284 g | 196 g |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 82.4 x 15 mm | 164,2 x 75,9 x 9.1 mm |
| Price | 109.99€ ($117.65) See Details | 105.66€ ($113.02) See Details |
Blackview BV6900 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV6900’s camera vs Samsung Galaxy A02s’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 16 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5K3P9 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV6900 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV6900 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV6900 | Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5580 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Blackview BV6900 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 94338 score points which is 2.34% faster than the Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB, which got 92177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV6900 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV6900 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 178 points score in "Single-core" of against the Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB which got 160, it is 11.25% faster. In "Multi-core" score 871 vs 907 (-3.97% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV6900 and Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV6900 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 2.34% faster in the Antutu test (2161 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp Samsung S5K3P9 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2280x1080 vs 1600x720.
- More battery capacity: 5580mAh vs 5000mAh (a difference of 580mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV6900 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB (advantages)
- Best weight: 88 grams less (196 vs 284).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Blackview BV6900 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9600E vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Blackview BV9600 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare Doogee S90C vs Blackview BV6900
- Compare HT F801C vs Blackview BV6900
Samsung Galaxy A02s 3/32GB related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A10s vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M12 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy M11 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A02s vs Samsung Galaxy A20
- Compare Oppo A15 vs Samsung Galaxy A02s