Compare Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Cubot X50
| Name | Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 | Cubot X50 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 236552 | 212388 |
| CPU | UNISOC Tiger T606 | MediaTek Helio P90 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 6.67 " |
| Resolution | 1612х720 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Four cameras |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung GW1 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 5180 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastic | Plastic |
| Weight | 195 g | g |
| Dimensions | 163.2 x 75.2 x 8.75 mm | mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Blackview models here
Alternatives to the Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10: Blackview BL8800 5G - Compare Blackview OSCAL S60 - Compare Blackview A100 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot X50: Cubot P50 - Compare Cubot P40 - Compare Cubot KingKong Power - Compare |
Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Cubot X50: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10’s camera vs Cubot X50’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1 sensor and the 64Mp Samsung GW1 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 | Cubot X50 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung S5KJN1 | Samsung GW1 |
| Flash | LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 8 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Cubot X50: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Cubot X50, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 | Cubot X50 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5180 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Cubot X50: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 236552 score points which is 11.38% faster than the Cubot X50, which got 212388. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Cubot X50: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 387 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X50 which got 389, it is -0.51% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1349 vs 1477 (-8.67% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 and Cubot X50? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 11.38% faster in the Antutu test (24164 score difference).
- More battery capacity: 5180mAh vs 4500mAh (a difference of 680mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X50 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Samsung GW1 compared to 50Mp Samsung S5KJN1
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1612х720.
Why it is better not to take Cubot X50 (disadvantages)
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Blackview BV5100
- Compare Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Blackview A95
- Compare Blackview BL5000 vs Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10
- Compare Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Blackview A55
- Compare Blackview OSCAL TIGER 10 vs Hotwav Note 12
Cubot X50 related comparisons
- Compare Cubot X50 vs Cubot X30
- Compare Cubot X50 vs Cubot C30
- Compare Cubot X50 vs Cubot Note 20 Pro
- Compare Cubot X50 vs Cubot X20 Pro
- Compare Cubot X50 vs Cubot Max 3