Compare Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Cubot KingKong AX
| Name | Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 | Cubot KingKong AX |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 381422 | 359821 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 6.58 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2408x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 12 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 108 Mp |
| Camera | Dual Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | Samsung HM2 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 8800 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 14 |
| Material | Metal and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 368 g | 296 g |
| Dimensions | 179.5 x 82.6 x 17 mm | 172 x 80.9 x 12.7 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Blackview models here
Alternatives to the Blackview Oscal Pilot 2: Blackview BL8800 5G - Compare Blackview BV6900 - Compare Blackview A20 - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot KingKong AX: Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot Max 3 - Compare Cubot Note 20 - Compare |
Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Cubot KingKong AX: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview Oscal Pilot 2’s camera vs Cubot KingKong AX’s camera, see the difference between the 50Mp Samsung GN5 sensor and the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 | Cubot KingKong AX |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 50 Mp | 108 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung GN5 | Samsung HM2 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Cubot KingKong AX: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Cubot KingKong AX, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 | Cubot KingKong AX |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 8800 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Cubot KingKong AX: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 381422 score points which is 6.00% faster than the Cubot KingKong AX, which got 359821. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Cubot KingKong AX: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 595 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot KingKong AX which got 589, it is 1.02% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1885 vs 1922 (-1.93% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 and Cubot KingKong AX? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 6.00% faster in the Antutu test (21601 score difference).
- More battery capacity: 8800mAh vs 5100mAh (a difference of 3700mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong AX (advantages)
- Best weight: 72 grams less (296 vs 368).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 50Mp Samsung GN5
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 2400x1080.
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong AX (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Blackview BV9300 Pro
- Compare Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Blackview BV6300 Pro
- Compare Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Blackview BV8800
- Compare Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Blackview BV6800 Pro
- Compare Blackview Oscal Pilot 2 vs Blackview BV9800
Cubot KingKong AX related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot King Kong 9
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot KingKong AX
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot Pocket 3