Compare Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb vs Catee CT300
Name | Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb | Catee CT300 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 32155 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6739 | |
Diagonal size | 5.5 " | " |
Resolution | 1440x720 | |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | |
RAM | 2 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | No | |
ROM | 16 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Dual Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 5500 mAh | mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | No | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 8.0 (Oreo) | |
Material | Plastics and rubber | |
Weight | 265 g | g |
Dimensions | 161.32 x 77.8 x 14.15 mm | mm |
Price | 109.99€ ($127.48) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Catee models here
Alternatives to the Catee CT300: |
Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb vs Catee CT300: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Doogee S55 Lite’s camera vs Catee CT300’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb | Catee CT300 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb vs Catee CT300: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Doogee S55 Lite vs Catee CT300, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb | Catee CT300 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 5500 mAh | mAh |
Type | Non-removable | |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | Yes | |
Wireless charging | No |
Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb vs Catee CT300: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 32155 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Catee CT300, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb vs Catee CT300: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 120 points score in "Single-core" of against the Catee CT300 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 370 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb and Catee CT300? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Catee CT300 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Catee CT300 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Doogee S55 Lite 2/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Nomu S10 vs Doogee S55 Lite
- Compare Doogee S30 vs Doogee S55 Lite
- Compare Doogee S60 Lite vs Doogee S55 Lite
- Compare Doogee S55 vs Doogee S55 Lite
- Compare Blackview BV5800 vs Doogee S55 Lite
Catee CT300 related comparisons
- Compare Cubot Manito vs Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro
- Compare Cubot Manito vs Xiaomi Redmi 4A
- Compare Xiaomi Mi5S Plus vs Meizu M6 Note
- Compare Cubot Manito vs Vernee Thor
- Compare Cubot Manito vs HomTom HT37 Pro