Compare Cubot A20 vs Cubot X9

Cubot A20 vs Cubot X9 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot A20 with Cubot X9.
Name	Cubot A20	Cubot X9

Antutu benchmark	229166	29637
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T616	MediaTek MT6592M
Diagonal size	6.75 "	5 "
Resolution	1600x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	4 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	128 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	16 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	5100 mAh	2200 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 14	Android 4.4
Material	Plastic	Metal frame and plastic case
Weight	214 g	124 g
Dimensions	169.35 x 77.8 x 9.55 mm	143.5 x 72.5 x 7.3 mm
Price	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot A20: Cubot Pocket - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - Compare Cubot P60 - Compare	59.53€ ($69.00) See Details

Cubot A20 vs Cubot X9: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot A20’s camera vs Cubot X9’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot A20	Cubot X9
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model		Sony IMX135
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	16 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Cubot A20 vs Cubot X9: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot A20 vs Cubot X9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot A20	Cubot X9
Battery	5100 mAh	2200 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days	4-5 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours	4-5 hours
Talk time	30 hours	20 hours
Fast charging	Yes	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot A20 vs Cubot X9: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot A20 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 229166 score points which is 673.24% faster than the Cubot X9, which got 29637. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot A20

On Sale Soon

229166

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

59.53€

$69.00

29637

Cubot A20 vs Cubot X9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot A20 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 322 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X9 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1186 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot A20

On Sale Soon

322 / 1186

Cubot X9

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6592M / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2200mAh

59.53€

$69.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot A20 and Cubot X9? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot A20 (advantages)

Good performance: Is 673.24% faster in the Antutu test (199529 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 13Mp Sony IMX135
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 5100mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 2900mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot A20 (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X9 (advantages)

Best weight: 90 grams less (124 vs 214).
Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot X9 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Cubot A20 related comparisons

Cubot X9 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons