Compare Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb with Cubot S200 .
Name	Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb	Cubot S200

Antutu benchmark	33539
CPU	MediaTek MT6735	MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size	5.5 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	3 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	4150 mAh	3300 mAh
Wireless charging
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 6.0
Material	Plastic
Weight	185 g	g
Dimensions	152.3 x 77.2 x 8.8 mm	mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb: Cubot Max 3 - Compare Cubot King Kong 7 8/256GB - Compare Cubot Note 30 - Compare	45.93€ ($49.00) See Details

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Dinosaur’s camera vs Cubot S200 ’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb	Cubot S200
Rear camera	13 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Dinosaur vs Cubot S200 , compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb	Cubot S200
Battery	4150 mAh	3300 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 33539 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S200 , which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb

5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4150mAh

90.85€

$96.91

33539

Cubot S200

5 inches (1280x720) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh

45.93€

$49.00

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S200 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb

5.5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 4150mAh

90.85€

$96.91

0 / 0

Cubot S200

5 inches (1280x720) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 13Mp / 3300mAh

45.93€

$49.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb and Cubot S200 ? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb (advantages)

More battery capacity: 4150mAh vs 3300mAh (a difference of 850mAh).
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S200 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .

Why it is better not to take Cubot S200 (disadvantages)

Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Dinosaur 3/16Gb related comparisons

Cubot S200 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.64/5 of 444

Frequent comparisons