0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot J5 vs Kingzone S3

Cubot J5 vs Kingzone S3 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot J5 with Kingzone S3.

Name Cubot J5 Kingzone S3
Cubot J5 Kingzone S3
Antutu benchmark 21244 20788
CPU MediaTek MT6580 MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 5.5 " 5 "
Resolution 960x480 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 2 5
RAM 2 Gb 1 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 16 GB 8 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 2800 mAh 2600 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 3 G 3 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 9.0 Android 6.0
Material Plastic Metal frame and plastic case
Weight 157 g 150 g
Dimensions 150.3 x 72 x 9.2 mm 143 x 71 x 8.7 mm
  Price 60.30€ ($69.64) See Details Discontinued. View all Kingzone models here
Alternatives to the Kingzone S3:

Cubot J5 vs Kingzone S3: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot J5’s camera vs Kingzone S3’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot J5 Kingzone S3
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Cubot J5 vs Kingzone S3: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot J5 vs Kingzone S3, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot J5 Kingzone S3
Battery 2800 mAh 2600 mAh
Type Removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days 1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode 7-8 hours 5-6 hours
Talk time 25 hours 25 hours
Fast charging No No
Wireless charging No

Cubot J5 vs Kingzone S3: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot J5 vs Kingzone S3: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot J5 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 2.19% faster than the Kingzone S3, which got 20788. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot J5
5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh
60.30€
$69.64
 
Kingzone S3
5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Cubot J5 vs Kingzone S3: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot J5 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 65 points score in "Single-core" of against the Kingzone S3 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 222 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot J5
5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh
60.30€
$69.64
 
Kingzone S3
5" (1280x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2600mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Cubot J5 and Kingzone S3? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J5 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 2.19% faster in the Antutu test (456 score difference).
  • More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2600mAh (a difference of 200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot J5 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Kingzone S3 (advantages)

  • Best weight: 7 grams less (150 vs 157).
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 960x480.

Why it is better not to take Kingzone S3 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot J5 related comparisons

Kingzone S3 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.41/5 of 22
Frequent comparisons