Compare THL 2015A vs Cubot J5

THL 2015A vs Cubot J5 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of THL 2015A with Cubot J5.
Name	THL 2015A	Cubot J5

Antutu benchmark	27911	21244
CPU	MediaTek MT6735	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	960x480
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	2
RAM	2 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX135
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	2700 mAh	2800 mAh
Wireless charging		No
Network	4 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 5.1	Android 9.0
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	143 g	157 g
Dimensions	144.6 x 71.6 x 7.5 mm	150.3 x 72 x 9.2 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all THL models here Alternatives to the THL 2015A:	60.30€ ($69.64) See Details

THL 2015A vs Cubot J5: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the THL 2015A’s camera vs Cubot J5’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp Sony IMX135 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	THL 2015A	Cubot J5
Rear camera	13 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX135
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

THL 2015A vs Cubot J5: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the THL 2015A vs Cubot J5, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	THL 2015A	Cubot J5
Battery	2700 mAh	2800 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	5-6 hours	7-8 hours
Talk time	20 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging		No

THL 2015A vs Cubot J5: Antutu benchmark comparison.

THL 2015A in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 27911 score points which is 31.38% faster than the Cubot J5, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

THL 2015A

5" (1280x720) Glass / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2700mAh

59.63€

$68.87

27911

Cubot J5

5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh

60.30€

$69.64

21244

THL 2015A vs Cubot J5: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

THL 2015A in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot J5 which got 65, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 222 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

THL 2015A

5" (1280x720) Glass / MT6735 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp Sony IMX135 / 2700mAh

59.63€

$68.87

0 / 0

Cubot J5

5.5 inches (960x480) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 2800mAh

60.30€

$69.64

65 / 222

What is the difference between THL 2015A and Cubot J5? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the THL 2015A (advantages)

Good performance: Is 31.38% faster in the Antutu test (6667 score difference).
Best weight: 14 grams less (143 vs 157).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp Sony IMX135 compared to 8Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 960x480.

Why it is better not to take THL 2015A (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J5 (advantages)

More battery capacity: 2800mAh vs 2700mAh (a difference of 100mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot J5 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

THL 2015A related comparisons

Cubot J5 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.61/5 of 100

Frequent comparisons