0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Nokia 1.3 vs Cubot J9

Nokia 1.3 vs Cubot J9 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Nokia 1.3 with Cubot J9.

Name Nokia 1.3 Cubot J9
Nokia 1.3 Cubot J9
Antutu benchmark 35188 23177
CPU Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 5.71 " 6.21 "
Resolution 1520x720 1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5 2
RAM 1 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No Yes
ROM 16 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Camera Single camera Four cameras
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 3000 mAh 4000 mAh
Wireless charging No No
Network 4 G 3 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led No Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No Yes
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q) Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Plastic Plastic
Weight 155 g g
Dimensions 147.3 x 75.4 x 8.7 mm mm
  Price 79.95€ ($85.52) See Details Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot J9:
Cubot J5 - Compare
Cubot Pocket - Compare
Cubot X9 - Compare

Nokia 1.3 vs Cubot J9: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Nokia 1.3’s camera vs Cubot J9’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Nokia 1.3 Cubot J9
Rear camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No No

Nokia 1.3 vs Cubot J9: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Nokia 1.3 vs Cubot J9, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Nokia 1.3 Cubot J9
Battery 3000 mAh 4000 mAh
Type Non-removable Non-removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days 6-7 days
Battery Life 1,5-2 days 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 6-7 hours 8-9 hours
Talk time 25 hours 30 hours
Fast charging No No
Wireless charging No No

Nokia 1.3 vs Cubot J9: Antutu benchmark comparison. Nokia 1.3 vs Cubot J9: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Nokia 1.3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 35188 score points which is 51.82% faster than the Cubot J9, which got 23177. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Nokia 1.3
5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 215 / 1Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3000mAh
79.95€
$85.52
 
Cubot J9
6.21" (1520x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

Nokia 1.3 vs Cubot J9: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Nokia 1.3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot J9 which got 65, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 222 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Nokia 1.3
5.71 inches (1520x720) Gorilla glass / Snapdragon 215 / 1Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3000mAh
79.95€
$85.52
 
Cubot J9
6.21" (1520x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4000mAh
On Sale Soon
On Sale Soon
 

What is the difference between Nokia 1.3 and Cubot J9? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Nokia 1.3 (advantages)

  • Good performance: Is 51.82% faster in the Antutu test (12011 score difference).

Why it is better not to take Nokia 1.3 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot J9 (advantages)

  • More battery capacity: 4000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 1000mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot J9 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Nokia 1.3 related comparisons

Cubot J9 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.38/5 of 13
Frequent comparisons