Compare Blackview BV9900E vs Cubot King Kong CS
| Name | Blackview BV9900E | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 171897 | 21244 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio P90 | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.84 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2340x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4380 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
| Network | 4 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 264 g | 220 g |
| Dimensions | 156.5 x 78.3 x 14.2 mm | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm |
| Price | 245.11€ ($255.36) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot Max 3 - Compare Cubot Pocket - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare |
Blackview BV9900E vs Cubot King Kong CS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Blackview BV9900E’s camera vs Cubot King Kong CS’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX582 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Blackview BV9900E | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX582 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Blackview BV9900E vs Cubot King Kong CS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Blackview BV9900E vs Cubot King Kong CS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Blackview BV9900E | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4380 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | Yes | No |
Blackview BV9900E vs Cubot King Kong CS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9900E in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 171897 score points which is 709.16% faster than the Cubot King Kong CS, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Blackview BV9900E vs Cubot King Kong CS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Blackview BV9900E in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 393 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong CS which got 60, it is 555.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1426 vs 249 (472.69% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Blackview BV9900E and Cubot King Kong CS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Blackview BV9900E (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 709.16% faster in the Antutu test (150653 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX582 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2340x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have wireless charging supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Blackview BV9900E (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- Best weight: 44 grams less (220 vs 264).
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 4380mAh (a difference of 20mAh).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have wireless charging support.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
Blackview BV9900E related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV9900 Pro vs Blackview BV9900E
- Compare Blackview BV9900E vs Blackview BL6000 Pro 5G
- Compare Blackview BV9700 Pro vs Blackview BV9900E
- Compare Blackview BV9900E vs Doogee S96 Pro
- Compare Blackview BL8000 vs Blackview BV9900E
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS