Compare Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot H2

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot H2 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong CS with Cubot H2.
Name	Cubot King Kong CS	Cubot H2

Antutu benchmark	21244
CPU	MediaTek MT6580	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	4400 mAh	5000 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	3 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)	Android 5.1
Material	Plastic	Metal frame and plastic case
Weight	220 g	230 g
Dimensions	154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm	149.9 x 76.5 x 9.1 mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot S200 - Compare Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare Cubot King Kong - Compare	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot H2: Cubot King Kong 6 - Compare Cubot Note 8 - Compare Cubot P50 - Compare

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot H2: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong CS’s camera vs Cubot H2’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot King Kong CS	Cubot H2
Rear camera	8 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot H2: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot H2, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot King Kong CS	Cubot H2
Battery	4400 mAh	5000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot H2: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot H2, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong CS

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

0.00€

$0.00

21244

Cubot H2

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 5000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot H2: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 60 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot H2 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 249 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong CS

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

0.00€

$0.00

60 / 249

Cubot H2

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 5000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong CS and Cubot H2? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)

Best weight: 10 grams less (220 vs 230).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot H2 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 4400mAh (a difference of 600mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot H2 (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons

Cubot H2 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.00/5 of 18

Frequent comparisons