Compare Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot S168

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot S168 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong CS with Cubot S168.
Name	Cubot King Kong CS	Cubot S168

Antutu benchmark	21244
CPU	MediaTek MT6580	MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size	5 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x720	960x540
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	4400 mAh	1900 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	3 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic
Weight	220 g	g
Dimensions	154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm	mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot Max 3 - Compare Cubot X9 - Compare Cubot P30 - Compare	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot S168: Cubot King Kong 7 8/256GB - Compare Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare Cubot P40 - Compare

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot S168: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong CS’s camera vs Cubot S168’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot King Kong CS	Cubot S168
Rear camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot S168: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot S168, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot King Kong CS	Cubot S168
Battery	4400 mAh	1900 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot S168: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S168, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong CS

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

0.00€

$0.00

21244

Cubot S168

5" (960x540) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 1900mAh

67.07€

$77.73

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot S168: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 60 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S168 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 249 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong CS

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

0.00€

$0.00

60 / 249

Cubot S168

5" (960x540) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 1900mAh

67.07€

$77.73

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong CS and Cubot S168? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)

Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 960x540.
More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 1900mAh (a difference of 2500mAh).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S168 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot S168 (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons

Cubot S168 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.00/5 of 18

Frequent comparisons