Compare Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot X17

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot X17 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong CS with Cubot X17.
Name	Cubot King Kong CS	Cubot X17

Antutu benchmark	21244
CPU	MediaTek MT6580	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	5 "	5 "
Resolution	1280x720	1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	2 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	16 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera	8 Mp	16 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	4400 mAh	2500 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	3 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic
Weight	220 g	g
Dimensions	154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm	mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot X20 Pro - Compare Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot X17: Cubot X9 - Compare Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare Cubot P40 - Compare

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot X17: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong CS’s camera vs Cubot X17’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot King Kong CS	Cubot X17
Rear camera	8 Mp	16 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot X17: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot X17, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot King Kong CS	Cubot X17
Battery	4400 mAh	2500 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot X17: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot X17, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong CS

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

0.00€

$0.00

21244

Cubot X17

5" (1920x1080) / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2500mAh

0.00€

$0.00

Cubot King Kong CS vs Cubot X17: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 60 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X17 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 249 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong CS

5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh

0.00€

$0.00

60 / 249

Cubot X17

5" (1920x1080) / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2500mAh

0.00€

$0.00

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong CS and Cubot X17? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)

More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 1900mAh).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X17 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 8Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1280x720.

Why it is better not to take Cubot X17 (disadvantages)

Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons

Cubot X17 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.00/5 of 18

Frequent comparisons