0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot King Kong CS vs Doogee DG685

Cubot King Kong CS vs Doogee DG685 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong CS with Doogee DG685.

Name Cubot King Kong CS Doogee DG685
Cubot King Kong CS Doogee DG685
Antutu benchmark 21244
CPU MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 5 " "
Resolution 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5
RAM 2 Gb Gb
Bezel-less No
ROM 16 GB GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp Mp
Battery 4400 mAh mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 3 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Plastic
Weight 220 g g
Dimensions 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS:
Cubot P60 - Compare
Cubot X9 - Compare
Cubot Note 30 - Compare
Discontinued. View all Doogee models here
Alternatives to the Doogee DG685:
Doogee S60 Lite - Compare
Doogee S35 - Compare
Doogee S55 - Compare

Cubot King Kong CS vs Doogee DG685: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong CS’s camera vs Doogee DG685’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot King Kong CS Doogee DG685
Rear camera 8 Mp Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp Mp
Flash No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Doogee DG685: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong CS vs Doogee DG685, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot King Kong CS Doogee DG685
Battery 4400 mAh mAh
Type Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Doogee DG685: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot King Kong CS vs Doogee DG685: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Doogee DG685, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong CS
5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
99.15€
$106.26
 

Cubot King Kong CS vs Doogee DG685: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 60 points score in "Single-core" of against the Doogee DG685 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 249 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong CS
5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
99.15€
$106.26
 

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong CS and Doogee DG685? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)

  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Doogee DG685 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Doogee DG685 (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons

Doogee DG685 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.00/5 of 18
Frequent comparisons