Compare Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Cubot King Kong CS
| Name | Vivo X50 8/128Gb | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326442 | 21244 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 6.56 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2376x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX598 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Metal frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | 173 g | 220 g |
| Dimensions | 159.5 × 75.4 × 7.5 mm | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Vivo models here
Alternatives to the Vivo X50 8/128Gb: Vivo X50 Pro+ 8/256GB - Compare Vivo iQOO Z8x - Compare Vivo IQOO 9 Pro 8/256GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot J5 - Compare Cubot Note 30 - Compare Cubot KingKong Power - Compare |
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Cubot King Kong CS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Vivo X50’s camera vs Cubot King Kong CS’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp Sony IMX598 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Vivo X50 8/128Gb | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 48 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX598 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Cubot King Kong CS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Vivo X50 vs Cubot King Kong CS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Vivo X50 8/128Gb | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4200 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Cubot King Kong CS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326442 score points which is 1436.63% faster than the Cubot King Kong CS, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb vs Cubot King Kong CS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Vivo X50 8/128Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 621 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong CS which got 60, it is 935.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1833 vs 249 (636.14% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Vivo X50 8/128Gb and Cubot King Kong CS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Vivo X50 8/128Gb (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1436.63% faster in the Antutu test (305198 score difference).
- Best weight: 47 grams less (173 vs 220).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp Sony IMX598 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2376x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Vivo X50 8/128Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 4200mAh (a difference of 200mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Vivo X50 8/128Gb related comparisons
- Compare Vivo X60 vs Vivo X50
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 vs Vivo X50
- Compare Vivo X50 vs Vivo S9
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Vivo X50
- Compare Oppo Reno 5 Pro vs Vivo X50
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS