Compare Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Cubot King Kong CS
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 421856 | 21244 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 780G | MediaTek MT6580 |
| Diagonal size | 5.65 " | 5 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 8 Gb | 2 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 16 GB |
| External memory | No | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 3 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 11 | Android 10.0 (Q) |
| Material | Plastic frame and glass case | Plastic |
| Weight | g | 220 g |
| Dimensions | mm | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Xiaomi models here
Alternatives to the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini: Xiaomi Redmi 10 5G 4/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Poco M5s 6/128GB - Compare Xiaomi Redmi 10 4/128GB - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS: Cubot KingKong Mini 3 - Compare Cubot King Kong 7 8/128GB - Compare Cubot P60 - Compare |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Cubot King Kong CS: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini’s camera vs Cubot King Kong CS’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX686 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 20 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Cubot King Kong CS: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Cubot King Kong CS, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini | Cubot King Kong CS |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 3500 mAh | 4400 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 5-6 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 6-7 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Cubot King Kong CS: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 421856 score points which is 1885.77% faster than the Cubot King Kong CS, which got 21244. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini vs Cubot King Kong CS: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 772 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong CS which got 60, it is 1186.67% faster. In "Multi-core" score 2427 vs 249 (874.70% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini and Cubot King Kong CS? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1885.77% faster in the Antutu test (400612 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX686 compared to 8Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 5Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 3500mAh (a difference of 900mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The advantages of both models
Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 11 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
- Compare Xiaomi Poco F3 vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10T vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
- Compare Xiaomi Mi 10S vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Xiaomi Redmi K40 Mini
Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare OUKITEL K12 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare HT F801C vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Ulefone Armor X6 vs Cubot King Kong CS
- Compare Zopo zp700 vs Cubot King Kong CS