0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot King Kong CS vs Zopo zp600+ (3D)

Cubot King Kong CS vs Zopo zp600+ (3D) Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong CS with Zopo zp600+ (3D).

Name Cubot King Kong CS Zopo zp600+ (3D)
Cubot King Kong CS Zopo zp600+ (3D)
Antutu benchmark 21244
CPU MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size 5 " "
Resolution 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 5
RAM 2 Gb Gb
Bezel-less No
ROM 16 GB GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb
Rear camera 8 Mp Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp Mp
Battery 4400 mAh mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 3 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 10.0 (Q)
Material Plastic
Weight 220 g g
Dimensions 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm mm
  Price Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong CS:
Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare
Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare
Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare
Discontinued. View all Zopo models here
Alternatives to the Zopo zp600+ (3D):

Cubot King Kong CS vs Zopo zp600+ (3D): Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong CS’s camera vs Zopo zp600+ (3D)’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot King Kong CS Zopo zp600+ (3D)
Rear camera 8 Mp Mp
Sensor model
Flash Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp Mp
Flash No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Zopo zp600+ (3D): battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong CS vs Zopo zp600+ (3D), compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot King Kong CS Zopo zp600+ (3D)
Battery 4400 mAh mAh
Type Non-removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging No

Cubot King Kong CS vs Zopo zp600+ (3D): Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot King Kong CS vs Zopo zp600+ (3D): Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Zopo zp600+ (3D), which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong CS
5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
149.01€
$171.21
 

Cubot King Kong CS vs Zopo zp600+ (3D): Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong CS in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 60 points score in "Single-core" of against the Zopo zp600+ (3D) which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 249 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong CS
5 inches (1280x720) Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 4400mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 
149.01€
$171.21
 

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong CS and Zopo zp600+ (3D)? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong CS (advantages)

  • Have water resistant supports.
  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong CS (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Zopo zp600+ (3D) (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Zopo zp600+ (3D) (disadvantages)

  • Does not have water resistant supports.
  • Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The advantages of both models

Cubot King Kong CS related comparisons

Zopo zp600+ (3D) related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.00/5 of 18
Frequent comparisons