Compare Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Cubot King Kong Mini
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Cubot King Kong Mini |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 326155 | 56199 |
| CPU | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G | MediaTek Helio A22 |
| Diagonal size | 6.5 " | 4 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 5 |
| RAM | 6 Gb | 3 Gb |
| Bezel-less | Yes | No |
| ROM | 128 GB | 32 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Camera | Four cameras | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 10.0 (Q) | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Metal frame and plastic case | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 187 g | 157 g |
| Dimensions | 159,9 x 75,1 x 8,4 mm | 119 x 58 x 12.1 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Samsung models here
Alternatives to the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold2 - Compare Samsung Galaxy S21 8/256GB - Compare Samsung Galaxy A03s - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot King Kong Mini: Cubot Note 20 - Compare Cubot King Kong - Compare Cubot King Kong Mini 2 - Compare |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Cubot King Kong Mini: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G’s camera vs Cubot King Kong Mini’s camera, see the difference between the 64Mp Sony IMX682 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Cubot King Kong Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 64 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX682 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Cubot King Kong Mini: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Cubot King Kong Mini, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Samsung Galaxy A52 5G | Cubot King Kong Mini |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 2000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 6-7 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Cubot King Kong Mini: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 326155 score points which is 480.36% faster than the Cubot King Kong Mini, which got 56199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G vs Cubot King Kong Mini: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 613 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot King Kong Mini which got 161, it is 280.75% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1916 vs 538 (256.13% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Samsung Galaxy A52 5G and Cubot King Kong Mini? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 480.36% faster in the Antutu test (269956 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 64Mp Sony IMX682 compared to 13Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Samsung S5KGD1 vs 8Mp .
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1080x540.
- More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2000mAh (a difference of 3000mAh).
- Have fast charging supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Samsung Galaxy A52 5G (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong Mini (advantages)
- Best weight: 30 grams less (157 vs 187).
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong Mini (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have fast charging support
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
- Have water resistant supports.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G related comparisons
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A52s vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A32 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy S20 FE vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A71 vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
- Compare Samsung Galaxy A53 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A52 5G
Cubot King Kong Mini related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong Mini vs Ulefone Armor 5S
- Compare Cubot King Kong Mini vs Cubot King Kong Mini 2
- Compare Blackview BV9100 vs Cubot King Kong Mini
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot King Kong Mini
- Compare Cubot King Kong 3 vs Cubot King Kong Mini