Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S168

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S168 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong Star with Cubot S168.
Name	Cubot King Kong Star	Cubot S168

Antutu benchmark	365772
CPU	MediaTek Dimensity 700	MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size	6.78 "	5 "
Resolution	2460x1080	960x540
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	12 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	256 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	100 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	10600 mAh	1900 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	5 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 13
Material	Plastics and rubber
Weight	395 g	g
Dimensions	180.2 x 80.8 x 17.8 mm	mm
Price	195.97€ ($225.84) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot S168: Cubot Note 20 - Compare Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot King Kong Mini 2 - Compare

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S168: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong Star’s camera vs Cubot S168’s camera, see the difference between the 100Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot King Kong Star	Cubot S168
Rear camera	100 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S168: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S168, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot King Kong Star	Cubot S168
Battery	10600 mAh	1900 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	8-9 days
Battery Life	5-6 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging	No

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S168: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong Star in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 365772 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S168, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong Star

195.97€

$225.84

365772

Cubot S168

5" (960x540) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 1900mAh

67.45€

$77.73

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S168: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong Star in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 633 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S168 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1947 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong Star

195.97€

$225.84

633 / 1947

Cubot S168

5" (960x540) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 1900mAh

67.45€

$77.73

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong Star and Cubot S168? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong Star (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 100Mp compared to 8Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 960x540.
More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 1900mAh (a difference of 8700mAh).
Have water resistant supports.
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong Star (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S168 (advantages)

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot S168 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have water resistant supports.
Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Cubot King Kong Star related comparisons

Cubot S168 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons