Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S308

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S308 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot King Kong Star with Cubot S308.
Name	Cubot King Kong Star	Cubot S308

Antutu benchmark	365772
CPU	MediaTek Dimensity 700	MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size	6.78 "	5 "
Resolution	2460x1080	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	12 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	256 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	100 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	10600 mAh	1800 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	5 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 13
Material	Plastics and rubber
Weight	395 g	g
Dimensions	180.2 x 80.8 x 17.8 mm	mm
Price	196.41€ ($225.84) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot S308: Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare Cubot King Kong 6 - Compare Cubot P30 - Compare

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S308: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong Star’s camera vs Cubot S308’s camera, see the difference between the 100Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot King Kong Star	Cubot S308
Rear camera	100 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	32 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S308: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S308, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot King Kong Star	Cubot S308
Battery	10600 mAh	1800 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	8-9 days
Battery Life	5-6 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	Yes
Wireless charging	No

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S308: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong Star in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 365772 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S308, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot King Kong Star

196.41€

$225.84

365772

Cubot S308

5" (1280x720) / MT6582 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 1800mAh

100.97€

$116.10

Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot S308: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot King Kong Star in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 633 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S308 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1947 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot King Kong Star

196.41€

$225.84

633 / 1947

Cubot S308

5" (1280x720) / MT6582 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 1800mAh

100.97€

$116.10

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot King Kong Star and Cubot S308? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong Star (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 100Mp compared to 13Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 1800mAh (a difference of 8800mAh).
Have water resistant supports.
Have fast charging supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong Star (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S308 (advantages)

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot S308 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have water resistant supports.
Does not have fast charging support

The advantages of both models

Cubot King Kong Star related comparisons

Cubot S308 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons