Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot X20 4/64Gb
| Name | Cubot King Kong Star | Cubot X20 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 365772 | 86199 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | MediaTek Helio P23 |
| Diagonal size | 6.78 " | 6.3 " |
| Resolution | 2460x1080 | 2340x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | Yes |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 100 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX350 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Battery | 10600 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | Android 9.0 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal frame and glass case |
| Weight | 395 g | 189 g |
| Dimensions | 180.2 x 80.8 x 17.8 mm | 157,1 х 74,6 х 8,1 mm |
| Price | 192.17€ ($225.84) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot X20 4/64Gb: Cubot King Kong Star - Compare Cubot Max 3 - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare |
Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot X20 4/64Gb: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong Star’s camera vs Cubot X20’s camera, see the difference between the 100Mp sensor and the 20Mp Sony IMX350 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot King Kong Star | Cubot X20 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 100 Mp | 20 Mp |
| Sensor model | Sony IMX350 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 13 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot X20 4/64Gb: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot X20, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot King Kong Star | Cubot X20 4/64Gb |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 10600 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 8-9 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot X20 4/64Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong Star in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 365772 score points which is 324.33% faster than the Cubot X20 4/64Gb, which got 86199. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot X20 4/64Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong Star in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 633 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X20 4/64Gb which got 156, it is 305.77% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1947 vs 875 (122.51% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong Star and Cubot X20 4/64Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong Star (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 324.33% faster in the Antutu test (279573 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 100Mp compared to 20Mp Sony IMX350
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 13Mp Sony IMX214.
- NFC supports.
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2460x1080 vs 2340x1080.
- More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 6600mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong Star (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X20 4/64Gb (advantages)
- Best weight: 206 grams less (189 vs 395).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot X20 4/64Gb (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
Cubot King Kong Star related comparisons
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot King Kong 9
- Compare Doogee S110 vs Cubot King Kong Star
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Cubot King Kong Star
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot KingKong AX
Cubot X20 4/64Gb related comparisons
- Compare Cubot X20 vs Doogee N20
- Compare Cubot X20 vs OUKITEL C17 Pro
- Compare Cubot X20 vs UMIDIGI A7 Pro
- Compare Cubot X20 vs Cubot P30
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Cubot X20