Compare Cubot King Kong vs THL 2016
Name | Cubot King Kong | THL 2016 |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
Antutu benchmark | 21244 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | MediaTek MT6735 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5.5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 2 Gb | 2 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb |
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Battery | 4400 mAh | 4500 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 3 G | 4 G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
NFC | No | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | GPS, A-GPS |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | Android 5.1 |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 220 g | g |
Dimensions | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm | mm |
Price | 92.11€ ($106.44) See Details |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all THL models here
Alternatives to the THL 2016: |
Cubot King Kong vs THL 2016: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs THL 2016’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot King Kong | THL 2016 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 8 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | Dual LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 5 Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong vs THL 2016: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs THL 2016, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot King Kong | THL 2016 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 4400 mAh | 4500 mAh |
Type | Non-removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging |
Cubot King Kong vs THL 2016: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the THL 2016, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong vs THL 2016: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the THL 2016 which got 151, it is -52.32% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 610 (-57.70% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and THL 2016? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the THL 2016 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 8Mp
- More battery capacity: 4500mAh vs 4400mAh (a difference of 100mAh).
Why it is better not to take THL 2016 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot King Kong related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Nomu S10 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Blackview R6 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Doogee S30
- Compare ZOJI Z7 vs Cubot King Kong
THL 2016 related comparisons
- Compare PPTV King 7S vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
- Compare Elephone S8 vs PPTV King 7S
- Compare PPTV King 7S vs Xiaomi Mi Max 2
- Compare PPTV King 7 vs PPTV King 7S
- Compare LeEco Le Max 2 vs PPTV King 7S