Compare Cubot King Kong vs THL 4000
| Name | Cubot King Kong | THL 4000 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 21244 | |
| CPU | MediaTek MT6580 | MediaTek MT6582 |
| Diagonal size | 5 " | 4.7 " |
| Resolution | 1280x720 | 960x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
| RAM | 2 Gb | 1 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 64Gb | |
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | ||
| Network | 3 G | G |
| Sim cards | ||
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | |
| NFC | No | |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
| Notifications Led | Yes | |
| Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 7.0 | |
| Material | Plastic | |
| Weight | 220 g | g |
| Dimensions | 154 x 79,2 x 11,2 mm | mm |
| Price | 93.62€ ($106.44) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all THL models here
Alternatives to the THL 4000: |
Cubot King Kong vs THL 4000: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot King Kong’s camera vs THL 4000’s camera, see the difference between the 8Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot King Kong | THL 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 8 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | |
| Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 2 Mp |
| Flash | No |
Cubot King Kong vs THL 4000: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot King Kong vs THL 4000, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot King Kong | THL 4000 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 4400 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | |
| Battery Life | 3-4 days | |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | |
| Talk time | 30 hours | |
| Fast charging | No | |
| Wireless charging |
Cubot King Kong vs THL 4000: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 21244 score points which is 100.00% faster than the THL 4000, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot King Kong vs THL 4000: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot King Kong in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 72 points score in "Single-core" of against the THL 4000 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 258 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot King Kong and THL 4000? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot King Kong (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 8Mp compared to 5Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 2Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 960x540.
- More battery capacity: 4400mAh vs 4000mAh (a difference of 400mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot King Kong (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the THL 4000 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take THL 4000 (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot King Kong related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Nomu S10 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Blackview R6 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot King Kong vs Doogee S30
- Compare ZOJI Z7 vs Cubot King Kong
THL 4000 related comparisons
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
- Compare UMIDIGI S2 Pro vs Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 5
- Compare Uhans A101s vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X
- Compare Xiaomi Mi5S Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 5 Plus