Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot Pocket
| Name | Cubot KingKong AX | Cubot Pocket |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 359821 | 137655 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | UNISOC Tiger T310 |
| Diagonal size | 6.58 " | 4 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 1080x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 296 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 172 x 80.9 x 12.7 mm | 119 x 58 x 12.5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot KingKong AX: Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot X9 - Compare |
80.35€ ($87.24) See Details |
Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot Pocket: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot KingKong AX’s camera vs Cubot Pocket’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot KingKong AX | Cubot Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot Pocket: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot Pocket, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot KingKong AX | Cubot Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot Pocket: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong AX in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 359821 score points which is 161.39% faster than the Cubot Pocket, which got 137655. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot Pocket: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong AX in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 589 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot Pocket which got 295, it is 99.66% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1922 vs 1012 (89.92% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot KingKong AX and Cubot Pocket? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong AX (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 161.39% faster in the Antutu test (222166 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 16Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 1080x540.
- More battery capacity: 5100mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 2100mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong AX (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)
- Best weight: 147 grams less (149 vs 296).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
Cubot KingKong AX related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot King Kong 9
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot KingKong AX
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot Pocket 3
Cubot Pocket related comparisons
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot King Kong Mini 2
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Soyes XS12