Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Ulefone Armor 22
| Name | Cubot KingKong AX | Ulefone Armor 22 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 359821 | 355659 |
| CPU | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G96 |
| Diagonal size | 6.58 " | 6.58 " |
| Resolution | 2408x1080 | 2408x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 8 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 128 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb |
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | Sony IMX686 |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 4 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | Yes | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Metal and rubber |
| Weight | 296 g | 324 g |
| Dimensions | 172 x 80.9 x 12.7 mm | 176.8 x 84.9 x 15 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot KingKong AX: Cubot Pocket - Compare Cubot P40 - Compare Cubot X20 Pro - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Ulefone models here
Alternatives to the Ulefone Armor 22: Ulefone Power Armor 16 Pro - Compare Ulefone Armor 5S - Compare Ulefone Armor 7E - Compare |
Cubot KingKong AX vs Ulefone Armor 22: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot KingKong AX’s camera vs Ulefone Armor 22’s camera, see the difference between the 108Mp Samsung HM2 sensor and the 64Mp Sony IMX686 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot KingKong AX | Ulefone Armor 22 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 108 Mp | 64 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung HM2 | Sony IMX686 |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 8 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Cubot KingKong AX vs Ulefone Armor 22: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot KingKong AX vs Ulefone Armor 22, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot KingKong AX | Ulefone Armor 22 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6600 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 8-9 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 5-6 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 10-12 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Cubot KingKong AX vs Ulefone Armor 22: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong AX in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 359821 score points which is 1.17% faster than the Ulefone Armor 22, which got 355659. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot KingKong AX vs Ulefone Armor 22: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong AX in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 589 points score in "Single-core" of against the Ulefone Armor 22 which got 564, it is 4.43% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1922 vs 1852 (3.78% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot KingKong AX and Ulefone Armor 22? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong AX (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 1.17% faster in the Antutu test (4162 score difference).
- Best weight: 28 grams less (296 vs 324).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 108Mp Samsung HM2 compared to 64Mp Sony IMX686
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp Sony IMX616 vs 8Mp OmniVision OV8856.
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong AX (disadvantages)
- Does not have infrared blaster supports.
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Ulefone Armor 22 (advantages)
- More battery capacity: 6600mAh vs 5100mAh (a difference of 1500mAh).
- Have infrared blaster supports.
Why it is better not to take Ulefone Armor 22 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Cubot KingKong AX related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot King Kong 9
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot KingKong AX
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot KingKong Mini 3
- Compare Cubot KingKong AX vs Cubot Pocket 3
Ulefone Armor 22 related comparisons
- Compare Ulefone Armor 24 vs Ulefone Armor 22
- Compare Ulefone Armor 22 vs Ulefone Power Armor 19
- Compare Ulefone Armor 22 vs Ulefone Armor X8
- Compare Ulefone Armor 22 vs Ulefone Armor 8 Pro
- Compare Ulefone Armor 22 vs Blackview BV9200