Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot GT95

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot GT95 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro with Cubot GT95.
Name	Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro	Cubot GT95

Antutu benchmark	108944
CPU	MediaTek Helio P22	MediaTek MT6572W
Diagonal size	4 "	4 "
Resolution	1080x540	800x480
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	4 Gb	0.5 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	4 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	13 Mp	5 Mp
Camera	Dual Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	0.3 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	1350 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 11
Material	Plastics and rubber
Weight	122 g	g
Dimensions	119 x 58 x 12.1 mm	mm
Price	88.27€ ($102.31) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot GT95: Cubot Pocket - Compare Cubot Note 20 - Compare Cubot S200 - Compare

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot GT95: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro’s camera vs Cubot GT95’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro	Cubot GT95
Rear camera	13 Mp	5 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	0.3 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot GT95: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot GT95, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro	Cubot GT95
Battery	3000 mAh	1350 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	8-9 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot GT95: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 108944 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot GT95, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro

4 inches (1080x540) Glass / Helio P22 / 4Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

88.27€

$102.31

108944

Cubot GT95

4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh

51.78€

$60.01

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro vs Cubot GT95: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 161 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot GT95 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 855 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro

4 inches (1080x540) Glass / Helio P22 / 4Gb / 64GB / 13Mp / 3000mAh

88.27€

$102.31

161 / 855

Cubot GT95

4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh

51.78€

$60.01

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro and Cubot GT95? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 5Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 5Mp vs 0.3Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1080x540 vs 800x480.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 1350mAh (a difference of 1650mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot GT95 (advantages)

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot GT95 (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro related comparisons

Cubot GT95 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons