Compare Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot GT90
Name | Cubot KingKong Power | Cubot GT90 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 199835 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT8788 | |
Diagonal size | 6.5 " | " |
Resolution | 2400x1080 | |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | |
RAM | 8 Gb | Gb |
Bezel-less | Yes | |
ROM | 256 GB | GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | |
Rear camera | 48 Mp | Mp |
Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
Battery | 10600 mAh | mAh |
Wireless charging | No | |
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | Yes | |
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 13 | |
Material | Plastics and rubber | |
Weight | 382 g | g |
Dimensions | 169.9 x 80.2 x 20 mm | mm |
Price | 129.92€ ($137.02) See Details |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot GT90: Cubot King Kong 6 - Compare Cubot P30 - Compare Cubot S200 - Compare |
Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot GT90: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot KingKong Power’s camera vs Cubot GT90’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot KingKong Power | Cubot GT90 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 48 Mp | Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 16 Mp | Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot GT90: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot GT90, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot KingKong Power | Cubot GT90 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 10600 mAh | mAh |
Type | Non-removable | |
Stand-by time | 8-9 days | |
Battery Life | 5-6 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 14-15 hours | |
Talk time | 30 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging | No |
Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot GT90: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong Power in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 199835 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot GT90, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot GT90: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong Power in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 328 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot GT90 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1485 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot KingKong Power and Cubot GT90? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong Power (advantages)
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong Power (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot GT90 (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot GT90 (disadvantages)
- Does not support NFC.
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The advantages of both models
Cubot KingKong Power related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong 8 vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare Cubot King Kong 9 vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare Blackview BV9300 vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare Cubot King Kong Star vs Cubot KingKong Power
- Compare Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot P80
Cubot GT90 related comparisons
- Compare Blackview BV8000 Pro vs Doogee Mix
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4 Pro vs Xiaomi Mi5
- Compare Blackview BV8000 Pro vs Blackview BV9000 Pro
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Xiaomi Mi5
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Doogee BL5000