Compare Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot S308

Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot S308 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot KingKong Power with Cubot S308.
Name	Cubot KingKong Power	Cubot S308

Antutu benchmark	199835
CPU	MediaTek MT8788	MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size	6.5 "	5 "
Resolution	2400x1080	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	8 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	256 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Triple Camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	16 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	10600 mAh	1800 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 13
Material	Plastics and rubber
Weight	382 g	g
Dimensions	169.9 x 80.2 x 20 mm	mm
Price	127.85€ ($137.02) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot S308: Cubot King Kong 7 8/256GB - Compare Cubot X9 - Compare Cubot P30 - Compare

Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot S308: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot KingKong Power’s camera vs Cubot S308’s camera, see the difference between the 48Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot KingKong Power	Cubot S308
Rear camera	48 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	16 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot S308: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot S308, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot KingKong Power	Cubot S308
Battery	10600 mAh	1800 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	8-9 days
Battery Life	5-6 days
Working hours in hard mode	14-15 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot S308: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot KingKong Power in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 199835 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S308, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot KingKong Power

6.5 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / MT8788 / 8Gb / 256GB / 48Mp / 10600mAh

127.85€

$137.02

199835

Cubot S308

5" (1280x720) / MT6582 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 1800mAh

108.33€

$116.10

Cubot KingKong Power vs Cubot S308: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot KingKong Power in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 328 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S308 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1485 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot KingKong Power

6.5 inches (2400x1080) Curved Glass / MT8788 / 8Gb / 256GB / 48Mp / 10600mAh

127.85€

$137.02

328 / 1485

Cubot S308

5" (1280x720) / MT6582 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 1800mAh

108.33€

$116.10

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot KingKong Power and Cubot S308? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong Power (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 48Mp compared to 13Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 16Mp vs 5Mp .
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 10600mAh vs 1800mAh (a difference of 8800mAh).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong Power (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S308 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot S308 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot KingKong Power related comparisons

Cubot S308 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons