Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot Pocket
| Name | Cubot KingKong Star 2 | Cubot Pocket |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 921484 | 137655 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | UNISOC Tiger T310 |
| Diagonal size | 6.72 " | 4 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1080x540 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 4 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 64 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb |
| Rear camera | 100 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Single camera |
| Sensor model | ||
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | No |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | No |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastic |
| Weight | 305 g | 149 g |
| Dimensions | 177.7 x 81.8 x 13.5 mm | 119 x 58 x 12.5 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot KingKong Star 2: Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare Cubot KingKong Power - Compare Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare |
73.94€ ($87.24) See Details |
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot Pocket: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot KingKong Star 2’s camera vs Cubot Pocket’s camera, see the difference between the 100Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot KingKong Star 2 | Cubot Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 100 Mp | 16 Mp |
| Sensor model | ||
| Flash | Dual LED flash | LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 5 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot Pocket: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot Pocket, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot KingKong Star 2 | Cubot Pocket |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 5-6 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 2-3 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 7-8 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 25 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | No |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot Pocket: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 921484 score points which is 569.42% faster than the Cubot Pocket, which got 137655. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot Pocket: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1103 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot Pocket which got 295, it is 273.90% faster. In "Multi-core" score 4077 vs 1012 (302.87% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot KingKong Star 2 and Cubot Pocket? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong Star 2 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 569.42% faster in the Antutu test (783829 score difference).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 100Mp compared to 16Mp
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 32Mp vs 5Mp .
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2400x1080 vs 1080x540.
- More battery capacity: 5100mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 2100mAh).
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong Star 2 (disadvantages)
- Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)
- Best weight: 156 grams less (149 vs 305).
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)
- Does not have water resistant supports.
- Does not have fast charging support
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong X Pro vs Cubot KingKong Star 2
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot King Kong 7
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot S200
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Doogee V40
Cubot Pocket related comparisons
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot King Kong Mini 2
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro
- Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot Pocket
- Compare Cubot Pocket vs Soyes XS12