Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Hotwav Cyber 15
| Name | Cubot KingKong Star 2 | Hotwav Cyber 15 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 921484 | 359844 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Diagonal size | 6.72 " | 6.6 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 12 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 100 Mp | 200 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Triple Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6280 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 5 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 305 g | 292 g |
| Dimensions | 177.7 x 81.8 x 13.5 mm | 174.6 x 82.3 x 12.8 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot KingKong Star 2: Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare Cubot P40 - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Hotwav models here
Alternatives to the Hotwav Cyber 15: Hotwav CYBER 8 4/64GB - Compare Hotwav CYBER 9 Pro - Compare Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro - Compare |
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Hotwav Cyber 15: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot KingKong Star 2’s camera vs Hotwav Cyber 15’s camera, see the difference between the 100Mp sensor and the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot KingKong Star 2 | Hotwav Cyber 15 |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 100 Mp | 200 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Hotwav Cyber 15: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Hotwav Cyber 15, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot KingKong Star 2 | Hotwav Cyber 15 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6280 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 6-7 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 3-4 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Hotwav Cyber 15: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 921484 score points which is 156.08% faster than the Hotwav Cyber 15, which got 359844. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Hotwav Cyber 15: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1103 points score in "Single-core" of against the Hotwav Cyber 15 which got 588, it is 87.59% faster. In "Multi-core" score 4077 vs 1915 (112.90% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot KingKong Star 2 and Hotwav Cyber 15? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong Star 2 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 156.08% faster in the Antutu test (561640 score difference).
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong Star 2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Hotwav Cyber 15 (advantages)
- Best weight: 13 grams less (292 vs 305).
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 100Mp
- More battery capacity: 6280mAh vs 5100mAh (a difference of 1180mAh).
Why it is better not to take Hotwav Cyber 15 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong X Pro vs Cubot KingKong Star 2
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot King Kong 7
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot S200
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Doogee V40
Hotwav Cyber 15 related comparisons
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber 13 Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav W11
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav Cyber X Pro
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Hotwav H1
- Compare Hotwav Cyber 15 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 4G