Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra
| Name | Cubot KingKong Star 2 | IIIF150 B2 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| Antutu benchmark | 921484 | 367366 |
| CPU | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | MediaTek Helio G99 |
| Diagonal size | 6.72 " | 6.78 " |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 2408x1080 |
| Multi-touch (number of touches) | 10 | 10 |
| RAM | 12 Gb | 12 Gb |
| Bezel-less | No | No |
| ROM | 256 GB | 256 GB |
| External memory | MicroSD (TF), support of card up to 2Tb | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb |
| Rear camera | 100 Mp | 200 Mp |
| Camera | Triple Camera | Dual Camera |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| dxomark mobile ranking | ||
| dxomark (photo) | ||
| dxomark (video) | ||
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 15000 mAh |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
| Network | 5 G | 4 G |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS |
| Notifications Led | No | Yes |
| Fingerprint's scanner | Yes | Yes |
| Operating system (OS) | Android 14 | Android 13 |
| Material | Plastics and rubber | Plastics and rubber |
| Weight | 305 g | 465 g |
| Dimensions | 177.7 x 81.8 x 13.5 mm | 176.4 x 81.8 x 19.9 mm |
| Price |
Notify me when it goes on sale.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot KingKong Star 2: Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare Cubot J5 - Compare Cubot Note 30 - Compare |
Discontinued.
View all IIIF150 models here
Alternatives to the IIIF150 B2 Ultra: IIIF150 Raptor - Compare IIIF150 B1 Pro - Compare IIIF150 B2021 - Compare |
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra: Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot KingKong Star 2’s camera vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra’s camera, see the difference between the 100Mp sensor and the 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
| Name | Cubot KingKong Star 2 | IIIF150 B2 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Rear camera | 100 Mp | 200 Mp |
| Sensor model | Samsung ISOCELL HP3 | |
| Flash | Dual LED flash | Dual LED flash |
| Front (selfie) camera | 32 Mp | 32 Mp |
| Flash | No | No |
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra: battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
| Name | Cubot KingKong Star 2 | IIIF150 B2 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 15000 mAh |
| Type | Non-removable | Non-removable |
| Stand-by time | 6-7 days | 8-9 days |
| Battery Life | 2-3 days | 5-6 days |
| Working hours in hard mode | 8-9 hours | 10-12 hours |
| Talk time | 30 hours | 30 hours |
| Fast charging | Yes | Yes |
| Wireless charging | No | No |
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra: Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 921484 score points which is 150.84% faster than the IIIF150 B2 Ultra, which got 367366. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs IIIF150 B2 Ultra: Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 1103 points score in "Single-core" of against the IIIF150 B2 Ultra which got 595, it is 85.38% faster. In "Multi-core" score 4077 vs 1921 (112.23% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot KingKong Star 2 and IIIF150 B2 Ultra? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot KingKong Star 2 (advantages)
- Good performance: Is 150.84% faster in the Antutu test (554118 score difference).
- Best weight: 160 grams less (305 vs 465).
Why it is better not to take Cubot KingKong Star 2 (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the IIIF150 B2 Ultra (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 200Mp Samsung ISOCELL HP3 compared to 100Mp
- Has a higher screen resolution: 2408x1080 vs 2400x1080.
- More battery capacity: 15000mAh vs 5100mAh (a difference of 9900mAh).
Why it is better not to take IIIF150 B2 Ultra (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- NFC supports.
- Have water resistant supports.
- Have fast charging supports.
Cubot KingKong Star 2 related comparisons
- Compare Cubot KingKong X Pro vs Cubot KingKong Star 2
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot King Kong 7
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Cubot S200
- Compare Cubot KingKong Star 2 vs Doogee V40
IIIF150 B2 Ultra related comparisons
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B2 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 B1 Pro
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 Raptor
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs IIIF150 R2022
- Compare IIIF150 B2 Ultra vs Cubot King Kong Star