Compare Cubot Manito 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200
Name | Cubot Manito 3/16Gb | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Antutu benchmark | 29000 | |
CPU | MediaTek MT6737 | MediaTek MT6582 |
Diagonal size | 5 " | 5 " |
Resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Multi-touch (number of touches) | 5 | 5 |
RAM | 3 Gb | 1 Gb |
Bezel-less | No | No |
ROM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
External memory | MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb | |
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Camera | Single camera | Single camera |
Sensor model | ||
dxomark mobile ranking | ||
dxomark (photo) | ||
dxomark (video) | ||
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Battery | 2350 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Wireless charging | ||
Network | 4 G | G |
Sim cards | ||
WiFi | Yes | Yes |
Bluetooth | Yes | |
NFC | ||
Navigation (Positioning) | GPS, A-GPS | |
Notifications Led | Yes | |
Fingerprint's scanner | No | |
Operating system (OS) | Android 6.0 | |
Material | Plastic | |
Weight | 178 g | g |
Dimensions | 144 x 72.8 x 9 mm | mm |
Price |
Discontinued.
View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot Manito 3/16Gb: Cubot P40 - Compare Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare Cubot Note 30 - Compare |
45.81€ ($49.00) See Details |
Cubot Manito 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Camera comparison.
In this table, you can compare the Cubot Manito’s camera vs Cubot S200 ’s camera, see the difference between the 13Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.
Name | Cubot Manito 3/16Gb | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Rear camera | 13 Mp | 13 Mp |
Sensor model | ||
Flash | LED flash | |
Front (selfie) camera | 5 Mp | 8 Mp |
Flash | No |
Cubot Manito 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : battery life comparison.
Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Manito vs Cubot S200 , compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.
Name | Cubot Manito 3/16Gb | Cubot S200 |
---|---|---|
Battery | 2350 mAh | 3300 mAh |
Type | Removable | Removable |
Stand-by time | 4-5 days | |
Battery Life | 1,5-2 days | |
Working hours in hard mode | 4-5 hours | |
Talk time | 20 hours | |
Fast charging | No | |
Wireless charging |
Cubot Manito 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Antutu benchmark comparison.
Cubot Manito 3/16Gb in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 29000 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S200 , which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.
Cubot Manito 3/16Gb vs Cubot S200 : Geekbench benchmark comparison.
Cubot Manito 3/16Gb in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 0 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S200 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 0 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.
What is the difference between Cubot Manito 3/16Gb and Cubot S200 ? (compare specs) (which is better)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Manito 3/16Gb (advantages)
Why it is better not to take Cubot Manito 3/16Gb (disadvantages)
The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S200 (advantages)
- Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
- More battery capacity: 3300mAh vs 2350mAh (a difference of 950mAh).
Why it is better not to take Cubot S200 (disadvantages)
The advantages of both models
- Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.
Cubot Manito 3/16Gb related comparisons
- Compare Cubot Manito vs Cubot King Kong
- Compare Cubot Max 2 vs Cubot Manito
- Compare Cubot Note 7 vs Cubot Manito
- Compare Cubot X20 Pro vs Cubot Manito
- Compare Cubot Note 20 Pro vs Cubot Manito
Cubot S200 related comparisons
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Plus
- Compare Xiaomi Redmi 4X Pro vs Micromax Selfie 3
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X
- Compare OUKITEL U11 Plus vs OUKITEL K6000 Pro