Compare Cubot Note 20 Pro vs Cubot S350

Cubot Note 20 Pro vs Cubot S350 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Note 20 Pro with Cubot S350.
Name	Cubot Note 20 Pro	Cubot S350

Antutu benchmark	146188
CPU	MediaTek Helio P60	MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size	6.5 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1600x720	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	6 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	Yes	No
ROM	128 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	12 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Four cameras	Single camera
Sensor model	Sony IMX486
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	4200 mAh	2200 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 10.0 (Q)
Material	Plastic
Weight	200 g	g
Dimensions	155.8 x 77 x 9.1 mm	mm
Price	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot Note 20 Pro: Cubot P30 - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot S350: Cubot KingKong 5 - Compare Cubot S200 - Compare Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare

Cubot Note 20 Pro vs Cubot S350: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Note 20 Pro’s camera vs Cubot S350’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp Sony IMX486 sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Note 20 Pro	Cubot S350
Rear camera	12 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model	Sony IMX486
Flash	Dual LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	8 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot Note 20 Pro vs Cubot S350: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Note 20 Pro vs Cubot S350, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Note 20 Pro	Cubot S350
Battery	4200 mAh	2200 mAh
Type	Removable	Removable
Stand-by time	6-7 days
Battery Life	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	10-12 hours
Talk time	30 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot Note 20 Pro vs Cubot S350: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Note 20 Pro in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 146188 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S350, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Note 20 Pro

6.5 inches (1600x720) Glass / Helio P60 / 6Gb / 128GB / 12Mp Sony IMX486 / 4200mAh

0.00€

$0.00

146188

Cubot S350

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6582 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2200mAh

98.47€

$114.13

Cubot Note 20 Pro vs Cubot S350: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Note 20 Pro in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 305 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S350 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1289 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Note 20 Pro

6.5 inches (1600x720) Glass / Helio P60 / 6Gb / 128GB / 12Mp Sony IMX486 / 4200mAh

0.00€

$0.00

305 / 1289

Cubot S350

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6582 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2200mAh

98.47€

$114.13

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot Note 20 Pro and Cubot S350? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Note 20 Pro (advantages)

NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1280x720.
More battery capacity: 4200mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot Note 20 Pro (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S350 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 13Mp compared to 12Mp Sony IMX486

Why it is better not to take Cubot S350 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Note 20 Pro related comparisons

Cubot S350 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 222

Frequent comparisons