0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot P50 vs Cubot GT95

Cubot P50 vs Cubot GT95 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot P50 with Cubot GT95.

Name Cubot P50 Cubot GT95
Cubot P50 Cubot GT95
Antutu benchmark 94522
CPU MediaTek Helio P22 MediaTek MT6572W
Diagonal size 6.21 " 4 "
Resolution 1520x720 800x480
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 6 Gb 0.5 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 128 GB 4 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera 12 Mp 5 Mp
Camera Triple Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 20 Mp 0.3 Mp
Battery 4200 mAh 1350 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 11
Material Plastic
Weight g g
Dimensions mm mm
  Price 182.63€ ($194.82) See Details Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot GT95:
Cubot KingKong Power - Compare
Cubot X9 - Compare
Cubot Pocket 3 - Compare

Cubot P50 vs Cubot GT95: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot P50’s camera vs Cubot GT95’s camera, see the difference between the 12Mp sensor and the 5Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot P50 Cubot GT95
Rear camera 12 Mp 5 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 20 Mp 0.3 Mp
Flash No

Cubot P50 vs Cubot GT95: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot P50 vs Cubot GT95, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot P50 Cubot GT95
Battery 4200 mAh 1350 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 8-9 hours
Talk time 30 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging No

Cubot P50 vs Cubot GT95: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot P50 vs Cubot GT95: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot P50 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 94522 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot GT95, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot P50
6.21 inches (1520x720) Curved Glass / Helio P22 / 6Gb / 128GB / 12Mp / 4200mAh
182.63€
$194.82
 
Cubot GT95
4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh
56.25€
$60.01
 

Cubot P50 vs Cubot GT95: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot P50 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 158 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot GT95 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 746 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot P50
6.21 inches (1520x720) Curved Glass / Helio P22 / 6Gb / 128GB / 12Mp / 4200mAh
182.63€
$194.82
 
Cubot GT95
4" (800x480) / MT6572W / 0.5Gb / 4GB / 5Mp / 1350mAh
56.25€
$60.01
 

What is the difference between Cubot P50 and Cubot GT95? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot P50 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 12Mp compared to 5Mp
  • Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 20Mp vs 0.3Mp .
  • NFC supports.
  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 800x480.
  • More battery capacity: 4200mAh vs 1350mAh (a difference of 2850mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot P50 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot GT95 (advantages)

Why it is better not to take Cubot GT95 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot P50 related comparisons

Cubot GT95 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 18
Frequent comparisons