0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR درهم SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot P60 vs Cubot X17s

Cubot P60 vs Cubot X17s Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot P60 with Cubot X17s.

Name Cubot P60 Cubot X17s
Cubot P60 Cubot X17s
Antutu benchmark 107944
CPU MediaTek Helio P35 MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size 6.51 " 5 "
Resolution 1600x720 1920x1080
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 6 Gb 3 Gb
Bezel-less Yes No
ROM 128 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera 20 Mp 16 Mp
Camera Dual Camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Battery 5000 mAh 2500 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G 4 G
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes Yes
NFC No
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led Yes
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 12 Android 5.1
Material Plastic Metal frame and plastic case
Weight g 145 g
Dimensions mm 143.4 x 69.4 x 6.2 mm
  Price 79.03€ ($82.43) See Details Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot X17s:
Cubot X20 Pro - Compare
Cubot King Kong Star - Compare
Cubot X9 - Compare

Cubot P60 vs Cubot X17s: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot P60’s camera vs Cubot X17s’s camera, see the difference between the 20Mp sensor and the 16Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot P60 Cubot X17s
Rear camera 20 Mp 16 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 8 Mp 8 Mp
Flash No

Cubot P60 vs Cubot X17s: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot P60 vs Cubot X17s, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot P60 Cubot X17s
Battery 5000 mAh 2500 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 6-7 days
Battery Life 3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode 10-12 hours
Talk time 30 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging No

Cubot P60 vs Cubot X17s: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot P60 vs Cubot X17s: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot P60 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 107944 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot X17s, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot P60
6.51 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio P35 / 6Gb / 128GB / 20Mp / 5000mAh
79.03€
$82.43
 
Cubot X17s
5" (1920x1080) / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2500mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

Cubot P60 vs Cubot X17s: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot P60 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 158 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X17s which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 889 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot P60
6.51 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio P35 / 6Gb / 128GB / 20Mp / 5000mAh
79.03€
$82.43
 
Cubot X17s
5" (1920x1080) / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 16Mp / 2500mAh
0.00€
$0.00
 

What is the difference between Cubot P60 and Cubot X17s? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot P60 (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 20Mp compared to 16Mp
  • More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 2500mAh (a difference of 2500mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot P60 (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X17s (advantages)

  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1920x1080 vs 1600x720.

Why it is better not to take Cubot X17s (disadvantages)

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot P60 related comparisons

Cubot X17s related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons