Compare Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot S168

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot S168 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket 3 with Cubot S168.
Name	Cubot Pocket 3	Cubot S168

Antutu benchmark	209744
CPU	MediaTek Helio G85	MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size	4.5 "	5 "
Resolution	1170x480	960x540
Multi-touch (number of touches)	5	5
RAM	4 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	8 GB
External memory	No
Rear camera	20 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	1900 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
Sim cards
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 12
Material	Plastics and rubber
Weight	g	g
Dimensions	mm	mm
Price	169.79€ ($196.79) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot S168: Cubot J5 - Compare Cubot Max 3 - Compare Cubot King Kong 5 Pro - Compare

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot S168: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket 3’s camera vs Cubot S168’s camera, see the difference between the 20Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Pocket 3	Cubot S168
Rear camera	20 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot S168: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot S168, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Pocket 3	Cubot S168
Battery	3000 mAh	1900 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	4-5 days
Battery Life	1,5-2 days
Working hours in hard mode	6-7 hours
Talk time	25 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot S168: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket 3 in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 209744 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S168, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket 3

4.5 inches (1170x480) Glass / Helio G85 / 4Gb / 64GB / 20Mp / 3000mAh

169.79€

$196.79

209744

Cubot S168

5" (960x540) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 1900mAh

67.07€

$77.73

Cubot Pocket 3 vs Cubot S168: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket 3 in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 386 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S168 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1371 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket 3

4.5 inches (1170x480) Glass / Helio G85 / 4Gb / 64GB / 20Mp / 3000mAh

169.79€

$196.79

386 / 1371

Cubot S168

5" (960x540) / MT6582 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 1900mAh

67.07€

$77.73

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket 3 and Cubot S168? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket 3 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 20Mp compared to 8Mp
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1170x480 vs 960x540.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 1900mAh (a difference of 1100mAh).
Have water resistant supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket 3 (disadvantages)

Does not have Headphone Jack. Need audio 3.5mm headphone jack adapter

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S168 (advantages)

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot S168 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.
Does not have water resistant supports.

The advantages of both models

Cubot Pocket 3 related comparisons

Cubot S168 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons