Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot P60

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot P60 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket with Cubot P60.
Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot P60

Antutu benchmark	137655	107944
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T310	MediaTek Helio P35
Diagonal size	4 "	6.51 "
Resolution	1080x540	1600x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	10
RAM	4 Gb	6 Gb
Bezel-less	No	Yes
ROM	64 GB	128 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 256Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	20 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	5000 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No	Yes
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 11	Android 12
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	149 g	g
Dimensions	119 x 58 x 12.5 mm	mm
Price	81.56€ ($87.24) See Details	77.06€ ($82.43) See Details

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot P60: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot P60’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 20Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot P60
Rear camera	16 Mp	20 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot P60: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot P60, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot P60
Battery	3000 mAh	5000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	6-7 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	3-4 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours	10-12 hours
Talk time	25 hours	30 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot P60: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 27.52% faster than the Cubot P60, which got 107944. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

81.56€

$87.24

137655

Cubot P60

6.51 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio P35 / 6Gb / 128GB / 20Mp / 5000mAh

77.06€

$82.43

107944

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot P60: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot P60 which got 158, it is 86.71% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 889 (13.84% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

81.56€

$87.24

295 / 1012

Cubot P60

6.51 inches (1600x720) Curved Glass / Helio P35 / 6Gb / 128GB / 20Mp / 5000mAh

77.06€

$82.43

158 / 889

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot P60? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)

Good performance: Is 27.52% faster in the Antutu test (29711 score difference).
NFC supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot P60 (advantages)

Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 20Mp compared to 16Mp
Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1600x720 vs 1080x540.
More battery capacity: 5000mAh vs 3000mAh (a difference of 2000mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot P60 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Pocket related comparisons

Cubot P60 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons