Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot R15

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot R15 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket with Cubot R15.
Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot R15

Antutu benchmark	137655	22174
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T310	MediaTek MT6580
Diagonal size	4 "	6.26 "
Resolution	1080x540	1520x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	4 Gb	2 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Dual Camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	3000 mAh
Wireless charging	No	No
Network	4 G	3 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes	No
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS
Notifications Led	No	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No	Yes
Operating system (OS)	Android 11	Android 9.0
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	149 g	173 g
Dimensions	119 x 58 x 12.5 mm	157,8 x 77 x 9,1 mm
Price	75.54€ ($87.24) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot R15: Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot X20 Pro - Compare Cubot Note 8 - Compare

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot R15: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot R15’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot R15
Rear camera	16 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot R15: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot R15, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot R15
Battery	3000 mAh	3000 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Non-removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours	6-7 hours
Talk time	25 hours	25 hours
Fast charging	No	No
Wireless charging	No	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot R15: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 520.79% faster than the Cubot R15, which got 22174. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.54€

$87.24

137655

Cubot R15

6.26" (1520x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

22174

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot R15: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot R15 which got 65, it is 353.85% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 222 (355.86% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.54€

$87.24

295 / 1012

Cubot R15

6.26" (1520x720) Curved Glass / MT6580 / 2Gb / 16GB / 8Mp / 3000mAh

0.00€

$0.00

65 / 222

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot R15? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)

Good performance: Is 520.79% faster in the Antutu test (115481 score difference).
Best weight: 24 grams less (149 vs 173).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 8Mp
NFC supports.

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot R15 (advantages)

Has a higher screen resolution: 1520x720 vs 1080x540.

Why it is better not to take Cubot R15 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Pocket related comparisons

Cubot R15 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons