0
Compare:
Compare with:
Please enter model name or part of it
 
AED درهم BHD دب BRL R$ CNY ¥ CZK Kč DKK kr EUR € GBP £ IDR Rp ILS ₪ INR ₹ JPY ¥ KRW ₩ KWD د.ك NOK kr PLN zł QAR ريال RUB руб SAR SAR SEK kr TRY ₺ UAH грн
You were probably searching for:
Reviews

Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S308

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S308 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket with Cubot S308.

Name Cubot Pocket Cubot S308
Cubot Pocket Cubot S308
Antutu benchmark 137655
CPU UNISOC Tiger T310 MediaTek MT6582
Diagonal size 4 " 5 "
Resolution 1080x540 1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches) 10 5
RAM 4 Gb 2 Gb
Bezel-less No No
ROM 64 GB 16 GB
External memory MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera 16 Mp 13 Mp
Camera Single camera Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Battery 3000 mAh 1800 mAh
Wireless charging No
Network 4 G G
Sim cards
WiFi Yes Yes
Bluetooth Yes
NFC Yes
Navigation (Positioning) GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led No
Fingerprint's scanner No
Operating system (OS) Android 11
Material Plastic
Weight 149 g g
Dimensions 119 x 58 x 12.5 mm mm
  Price 81.02€ ($87.24) See Details Discontinued. View all Cubot models here
Alternatives to the Cubot S308:
Cubot P40 - Compare
Cubot Note 8 - Compare
Cubot KingKong Mini 2 Pro - Compare

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S308: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot S308’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name Cubot Pocket Cubot S308
Rear camera 16 Mp 13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash LED flash
Front (selfie) camera 5 Mp 5 Mp
Flash No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S308: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S308, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name Cubot Pocket Cubot S308
Battery 3000 mAh 1800 mAh
Type Non-removable Removable
Stand-by time 5-6 days
Battery Life 2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode 7-8 hours
Talk time 25 hours
Fast charging No
Wireless charging No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S308: Antutu benchmark comparison. Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S308: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S308, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket
4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh
81.02€
$87.24
 
Cubot S308
5" (1280x720) / MT6582 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 1800mAh
107.82€
$116.10
 

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S308: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S308 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket
4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh
81.02€
$87.24
 
Cubot S308
5" (1280x720) / MT6582 / 2Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 1800mAh
107.82€
$116.10
 

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot S308? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)

  • Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp
  • NFC supports.
  • More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 1800mAh (a difference of 1200mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S308 (advantages)

  • Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 1080x540.

Why it is better not to take Cubot S308 (disadvantages)

  • Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

  • Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Pocket related comparisons

Cubot S308 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5
4.50/5 of 2
Frequent comparisons