Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket with Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb.
Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb

Antutu benchmark	137655
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T310	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	4 "	5.5 "
Resolution	1080x540	1280x720
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	4 Gb	3 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	16 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	13 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	2700 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 11
Material	Plastic
Weight	149 g	165 g
Dimensions	119 x 58 x 12.5 mm	151.7 x 76.5 x 7.0 mm
Price	75.54€ ($87.24) See Details	Notify me when it goes on sale. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb: Cubot X30 8/256Gb - Compare Cubot Max 3 - Compare Cubot S200 - Compare

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot S550 Pro’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 13Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	13 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	8 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S550 Pro, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb
Battery	3000 mAh	2700 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours
Talk time	25 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 100.00% faster than the Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb, which got 0. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.54€

$87.24

137655

Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2700mAh

On Sale Soon

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb which got 113, it is 161.06% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 390 (159.49% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

75.54€

$87.24

295 / 1012

Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb

5.5" (1280x720) / MT6735 / 3Gb / 16GB / 13Mp / 2700mAh

On Sale Soon

113 / 390

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)

Best weight: 16 grams less (149 vs 165).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 13Mp
NFC supports.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2700mAh (a difference of 300mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb (advantages)

Has a higher resolution front (selfie) camera: 8Mp vs 5Mp .
Has a higher screen resolution: 1280x720 vs 1080x540.

Why it is better not to take Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Pocket related comparisons

Cubot S550 Pro 3/16Gb related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons