Compare Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X12

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X12 Comparison - Compare Size, Cameras, Specs, Features, Price of Cubot Pocket with Cubot X12.
Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot X12

Antutu benchmark	137655	22000
CPU	UNISOC Tiger T310	MediaTek MT6735
Diagonal size	4 "	5 "
Resolution	1080x540	960x540
Multi-touch (number of touches)	10	5
RAM	4 Gb	1 Gb
Bezel-less	No	No
ROM	64 GB	8 GB
External memory	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 128Gb	MicroSD (TF), supports cards up to 32Gb
Rear camera	16 Mp	8 Mp
Camera	Single camera	Single camera
Sensor model
dxomark mobile ranking
dxomark (photo)
dxomark (video)
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Battery	3000 mAh	2200 mAh
Wireless charging	No
Network	4 G	4 G
WiFi	Yes	Yes
Bluetooth	Yes	Yes
NFC	Yes
Navigation (Positioning)	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS	GPS, A-GPS, GLONAS
Notifications Led	No
Fingerprint's scanner	No	No
Operating system (OS)	Android 11	Android 5.1
Material	Plastic	Plastic
Weight	149 g	143 g
Dimensions	119 x 58 x 12.5 mm	143.8 x 71.2 x 8.1 mm
Price	84.18€ ($87.24) See Details	Discontinued. View all Cubot models here Alternatives to the Cubot X12: Cubot X20 Pro - Compare Cubot J5 - Compare Cubot X30 8/128Gb - Compare

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X12: Camera comparison.

In this table, you can compare the Cubot Pocket’s camera vs Cubot X12’s camera, see the difference between the 16Mp sensor and the 8Mp sensor, and understand which camera has the maximum benefits compared to the competitor.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot X12
Rear camera	16 Mp	8 Mp
Sensor model
Flash	LED flash
Front (selfie) camera	5 Mp	5 Mp
Flash	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X12: battery life comparison.

Below, you can find the last battery life test between the Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X12, compare the difference between their batteries when in performance or normal mode, and see what chargers they support.

Name	Cubot Pocket	Cubot X12
Battery	3000 mAh	2200 mAh
Type	Non-removable	Removable
Stand-by time	5-6 days
Battery Life	2-3 days
Working hours in hard mode	7-8 hours
Talk time	25 hours
Fast charging	No
Wireless charging	No

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X12: Antutu benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the AnTuTu benchmark test got 137655 score points which is 525.70% faster than the Cubot X12, which got 22000. You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Antutu test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

84.18€

$87.24

137655

Cubot X12

5" (960x540) / MT6735 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2200mAh

56.96€

$59.03

22000

Cubot Pocket vs Cubot X12: Geekbench benchmark comparison.

Cubot Pocket in the Geekbench benchmark tests got a 295 points score in "Single-core" of against the Cubot X12 which got 0, it is 100.00% faster. In "Multi-core" score 1012 vs 0 (100.00% faster). You can compare its ranking and performance with other models results based on the Geekbench test below.

Cubot Pocket

4 inches (1080x540) Curved Glass / Tiger T310 / 4Gb / 64GB / 16Mp / 3000mAh

84.18€

$87.24

295 / 1012

Cubot X12

5" (960x540) / MT6735 / 1Gb / 8GB / 8Mp / 2200mAh

56.96€

$59.03

0 / 0

What is the difference between Cubot Pocket and Cubot X12? (compare specs) (which is better)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot Pocket (advantages)

Good performance: Is 525.70% faster in the Antutu test (115655 score difference).
Has a higher resolution newer rear camera: 16Mp compared to 8Mp
NFC supports.
Has a higher screen resolution: 1080x540 vs 960x540.
More battery capacity: 3000mAh vs 2200mAh (a difference of 800mAh).

Why it is better not to take Cubot Pocket (disadvantages)

The main differences, why it is better to choose the Cubot X12 (advantages)

Best weight: 6 grams less (143 vs 149).

Why it is better not to take Cubot X12 (disadvantages)

Does not support NFC.

The advantages of both models

Have headphone Jack. 3.5mm supports.

Cubot Pocket related comparisons

Cubot X12 related comparisons

Rate this page: 1-5

4.50/5 of 2

Frequent comparisons